Local Television Websites Report Card
Thursday, April 2nd, 2009Recently, I was watching Channel 5’s (WTVF-Nashville’s CBS affiliate) news, when it suddenly occurred to me that I had not seen a regular reporter on their newscasts in some time. So, in an effort to determine if my suspicion that this reporter was no longer with the station was true, I did what every web savvy viewer would do. I went online to their website to view the station’s staff bios. After five minutes, I was still digging through all the pages and navigation and could not find the bios of even the station’s most recognizable personalities. I finally found the station’s bios, two days later when I was looking for something else. I stumbled upon it which is a terrible way to find something after the fact.
As a disclaimer, I should confess, I come across hundreds of web sites every day. Most through my work as a product manager for a social network, but also as a user of social sites like Facebook and Twitter. Rarely do I come across sites that are less user-friendly for their audiences than local television web sites. Often, these stations pack too much information into their pages or overload them with ads. It seems like user experience is a secondary concern for these stations.
All of this leads me to this blog post. Rating these web sites is long overdue. We’ll start with the best and work our way down to the worst.
| WKRN - Channel 2 (ABC Affiliate) Grade: B Review Breakdown
|
![]() |
This web site’s is the tale of two homepages. The top half of the homepage is clean and easy to navigate. The lower half is jumbled, with uneven blocks of content that are a complete withdrawal from the clean theme displayed at the top of the page. Over all, WKRN’s web site is as good a user experience as any local television web site in Nashville.
| WSMV - Channel 4 (NBC Affiliate) Grade: B Review Breakdown
|
![]() |
This web site’s layout is classic yet functional. There is the obligatory banner ad right under the masthead of the homepage. It is intrusive and breaks the flow of the web site. It’s to be expected, since tv stations rely very much of advertising revenue. The three column content layout is easy enough to navigate and the menu on the left is very easy to use.
| WZTV - Channel 17 (FOX Affiliate) Grade: C- Review Breakdown
|
![]() |
The FOX 17 web site is different. The content modules with blue backgrounds and white text set the tone, with orange elements offsetting the blue, its a different approach to a serious news web site. Parts of the homepage are very professional, other parts are very campy. The biggest downfall of this site is the lack of an integrated video player. The absence of this feature really sets it back. Of all the TV station sites reviewed, this web site actually hits the mark with their SEO efforts.
| WTVF - Channel 5 (CBS Affiliate) Grade: D+ Review Breakdown
|
![]() |
It saddens me to put NewsChannel 5 at the bottom because it is my preferred station for news, but after spending an excessive amount of time trying to find a reporter’s bio, I realized this web site is a bit of a train wreck. I noticed a common theme between WKRN and WTVF’s web sites. Both use a content management service called WorldNow. Both sites are using last generation markup for the site structure and overall design is a bit scattered. The lack of a true sitemap only adds to the misorganization. My biggest pet peeve with this web site is when the anchors say visit our website for more details about a story and you can’t find the story without scanning several pages. This is a very poor user experience. Add a true search, not the watered down Google site search.
If you have opinions about local television’s web sites, please leave a comment. I would love to hear what you think of these four websites.














